Latest News

Hot Issues
spacer
Customer-centred innovation underpins high satisfaction among financial advice customers
spacer
An investor's personal trainer
spacer
Two sides to the age profile of SMSF members
spacer
Actuaries call for end to superannuation policy tinkering
spacer
ATO urges caution on pensions
spacer
Market Update - February 2015
spacer
Aussie economy shifts gears as structural changes take hold
spacer
The catch 22 of retirement savings
spacer
Are there reasons to help the tax man do his job?
spacer
Some financial terms explained
spacer
Small business paradox
spacer
Good financial planning finally has a value: 23% more in retirement
spacer
Market Update - January 2015
spacer
‘Incredibly high’ number of trustees hold no life insurance
spacer
SMSFs in 2015 Budget’s firing line
spacer
Rebalancing resolutions
spacer
Hammering away at asset allocation is only part of the retirement income solution
spacer
Market Update – December 2014
Article archive
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
SMSF Management
Severe penalties can be imposed against trustees for failing to act appropriately. One of the prudential requirements of superannuation funds operations is that the fund is not used for personal purposes.

One such rule is that a loan to a member, or a withdrawal without any of the eligibility requirements being met, is prohibited.

In a recent case, the trustees were given a civil penalty of $15,000 for making a loan of $75,000 to a member who got into financial difficulties and "borrowed" from the self managed superannuation fund.

Whilst the borrowing may have solved the short term cash flow problem for the member, the message is clear, superannuation is for retirement benefits only and penalties can be quite significant.

Not only was the penalty imposed significant, but it was also less than the potential one of non-complying status, which would have imposed an even greater tax on the superannuation fund.

If the fund had been wound up by the trustees hoping to prevent this harsher penalty, the Tax Office have found a way around it.

Reference
ICAA March 2011 audio program
- Sole purpose test and civil penalty for SMSF contravention Olsen v Eddy (2001) FCA 13